Honestly? No, not every couple needs a wedding videographer, and I say that as one. But here’s the part most people get wrong: the question isn’t really “do we need a video”, it’s “how much of our own wedding are we prepared to miss”? Because you will miss a lot of it – you’re in it, not watching it – and film is the only thing that gives those bits back. Let me make the full case, both ways, and then it’s up for you two to decide.
Let’s take the objection seriously, because it’s not silly.
The cost. It’s real money. Most Adelaide wedding videographers start around $4,500–$5,500, and if you’re already staring down a venue bill, catering, a photographer and a dress, another few grand can feel like the thing to cut. Fair. I’ve priced my own Full Package at $3,300 partly because I think that gap got silly. No wedding tax, but even $3,300 is not nothing, so I do understand what you’re weighing up.
“We’ll never watch it.” This is the big one, and it deserves a proper answer. I have elaborated on this further below.
The cringe factor. Some people genuinely hate being filmed or being a bit shy (naw diddums), to the point where a camera in the room would make the day worse. If that’s you, no videographer worth their gear should talk you out of it. At the end of the day, it’s your day, and you should be as comfortable as you want to be.
Some couples are fine without a wedding video. The question is whether you’re one of them.
Here’s what I’ve noticed: people imagine a wedding video as an old-school, 90-minute VHS-style slog they’ll watch once, politely, and never again. That’s not what a modern film is. A highlights film is a handful of minutes. You can watch it on your phone on the couch. On your first anniversary. On a rubbish Tuesday when you’re procrastinating at work – possibly in the toilet.
And the watching changes over time. In year one it’s fun. In year ten it’s your kids asking who everyone is. In year thirty, some of the people in that film are gone, and hearing their voice — actually hearing it — is worth more than anything else you spent money on that day. Photos show you what people looked like. Film gives you back how they sounded, how they moved, how they laughed. That’s the good stuff, and it’s the whole reason I do this audio-first, with proper recorders on every ceremony.
When I was organising the wedding video for Amy & Jayde, they were so excited to get their video as the first videographer they booked magically disappeared.
They were so grateful when they watched the video, as there were so many moments that they completely forgot about due to the blur of the day. It was the same story for Darren & Sarah
This is the argument I’d make even if I weren’t a videographer: you only witness about half of your own wedding.
I filmed a forest wedding out at Kuitpo Hall where half the best moments happened nowhere near the couple — that’s just how weddings work. You’re the centre of the day and somehow you see the least of it.
If you’ve decided you want a wedding videographer, it’s important to book them in asap so you get the style that you want!
Here’s the option most couples don’t know exists: you don’t have to choose between a full-day film and nothing. A ceremony-only film is $990 — the vows, the ring, the kiss, all with proper audio. It covers the single most irreplaceable hour of the day for less than a grand. If budget is the only thing holding you back, that’s your answer, and I’ve broken down all the numbers in my wedding video cost FAQ.
Still on the fence? Honestly, that’s the right place to think it through. If you want a straight answer about your specific day — no pressure, no pitch — send me a message and we’ll have a chat.
Now you may that you need a wedding videographer. Here’s the answer to your next question: how do I go about choosing a wedding videographer?
Sign up for our newsletter to see some of our recent work and give you some tips to help you decide on your wedding videography, and we’ll give ya a free videobook when you book any package with us. Valued at $200 – it’s yours for absolutely nothin’